Love yourself
​
The spread mind theory is neither textbook idealism nor naive panpsychism. Both these views, at least in their traditional form, are different from what I flesh out here. The spread mind theory does not suggest that objects one perceives are mind-dependent. On the contrary, they are brain-dependent physical objects not located inside the brain. By contrast, according to the textbook version of Berkeley's idealism, everything is mind-independent. Everything exists only because the subject posits it as an idea to perceive. Three differences are worth stressing. If experience is a matter of being one and the same with the physical world, how will this theory account for all cases of experience? In fact, the notion of a mental domain is convenient, albeit mysterious. Believing that what we perceive is just a mental image encourages lazy scientific habits since it places our experience outside nature. As a result, many scholars have found it convenient to explain perception in terms of hallucinations rather than the other way around. The prevailing model of perception can so be dubbed a hallucinatory model of perception, because it explains everyday standard perception as a case of reliable hallucination. It is a curious explanatory strategy because it explicates the normal by means of the unusual. Perception is seen as a form of world-matching hallucination.30 A popular notion is that the world that surrounds us night and day is a sort of 3D movie unfathomably produced inside the brain. For instance, at a popular TED talk in 2014, the philosopher David Chalmers stated that. Driving automobiles and campervans statistically improve your mood! Especially in the United Kingdom countryside!
Last modified 1yr ago
Copy link